Description
Based on your air cargo research paper topic, please explore the different types of aircraft you would pick as your primary aircraft. If your topic is a terminal, hub, or air cargo facility, what aircraft selection would you select for operation at your facility?
Write and submit a two to three-page paper (not including title or references pages). Please number and state each question/statement, and give each answer its own separate paragraph(s) that addresses the following:
Introduction
Top 3 aircraft
What are the top 3 aircraft you would examine for your paper?
The aircraft selected
Which one did you select for your paper?
Advantages
What are the advantages of your primary aircraft selection?
Disadvantages
What are the disadvantages of your primary aircraft selection?
Operational concerns or issues
Does your aircraft have any operational concerns or issues?
Maintenance concerns or issues
Does your aircraft have any maintenance concerns or issues?
Conclusions
BSAB 410 5.2 Written Assignment Rubric
| BSAB 410 5.2 Written Assignment Rubric |
| Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContext (10%)
Points Possible: 10 |
| 10.0 to >9.0 pts
Superior (receives 90-100% of criteria point value)
Provides an effective overview/introduction and develops a coherent, central theme that is expressed in a well-structured, organized, and logically-consistent manner throughout. Fully addresses any other assignment requirements given. |
9.0 to >7.0 pts
Average (receives 70-89% of criteria point value)
Provides a sufficient overview/introduction and develops some level of a central theme that is expressed in an acceptably organized manner. Addresses any other assignment requirements given to an acceptable level. |
7.0 to >0 pts
Poor (receives below 70% of criteria point value)
Provides little or no overview/introduction and lacks any coherent, central theme; illogical structure and organization. Does not address any other assignment requirements well or at all. |
|
10.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis (20%)
Points Possible: 20 |
| 20.0 to >18.0 pts
Superior (receives 90-100%)
Comprehensively identifies and analyzes key issues and relationships between factors with real-world examples and accurate details; assumptions and missing information are revealed and addressed. |
18.0 to >14.0 pts
Average (receives 70-89%)
Identifies and analyzes at least a few key issues and relationships between factors; may be lacking authentic examples and specific details; assumptions and missing information are not revealed and addressed at any level. |
14.0 to >0 pts
Poor (receives below 70%)
Writing generally shows minimal or no evidence the student has done the required research and analysis, consisting instead of opinions, feelings and impressions. |
|
20.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvaluation (20%)
Points Possible: 20 |
| 20.0 to >18.0 pts
Superior (receives 90-100%)
Presents a strong, well-supported argument based on relevant concepts, theories, and frameworks that present new ideas and makes accurate outcome predictions (when applicable) with creativity and insightfulness; offers possible, alternative interpretations and considers multiple perspectives. |
18.0 to >14.0 pts
Average (receives 70-89%)
A valid argument with at least some reference to relevant concepts, theories and/or frameworks is present; exhibits thoughtfulness; makes some effort towards predicting outcomes, (when applicable). |
14.0 to >0 pts
Poor (receives below 70%)
Arguments presented, if any, are from opinion, not from evidence; contains no linkages to relevant concepts, theories and/or frameworks; exhibits minimal creativity and insight. |
|
20.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeKnowledge& Comprehension (20%)
Points Possible: 20 |
| 20.0 to >18.0 pts
Superior (receives 90-100%)
Uses significant examples, exhibits, evidence, research, and/or data from course content and from valid, external information sources throughout. |
18.0 to >14.0 pts
Average (receives 70-89%)
Some evidence is used in appropriate locations throughout the paper. |
14.0 to >0 pts
Poor (receives below 70%)
Minimal or no evidence is present to validate analysis, evaluation or other important elements in the assignment. |
|
20.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication (20%)
Points Possible: 20 |
| 20.0 to >18.0 pts
Superior (receives 90-100%)
Formulates a resolution, recommendations, and/or action plan that include possible consequences and outcome scenarios. (when applicable) |
18.0 to >14.0 pts
Average (receives 70-89%)
A partial attempt is made to offer a resolution, recommendations, and/or action plan; may be vague and incomplete. (when applicable) |
14.0 to >0 pts
Poor (receives below 70%)
Minimal or no attempt is made to offer a resolution, recommendations, and/or action plan; or those given are clearly inappropriate. (when applicable) |
|
20.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics (10%)
Points Possible: 10 |
| 10.0 to >9.0 pts
Superior (receives 90-100%)
Uses proper, APA citations and references; grammatically-sound and free of spelling errors, following required formatting rules. |
9.0 to >7.0 pts
Average (receives 70-89%)
Citations are sometimes missing and/or are incorrect; an acceptable level of writing is exhibited, even with a few mechanical mistakes, but the communication is clear nonetheless. |
7.0 to >0 pts
Poor (receives below 70%)
Lack of any sort of citation; grammar, spelling, and/or word choice errors are frequent enough that the communication is muddled or incomprehensible. |
|
10.0 pts |
| Total Points: 100.0 |
