Covid-19 and how it affects one person’s rights

 

 

Order Number			45471455714
Type of Paper			Essay
Writer Classification Level			Undergraduate
Style of Writing			MLA/APA/CHICAGO/
Sources and References			5
Number of Pages			4
Paper Instructions Description Provide a brief background about the COVID-19 crisis. Provide an overview and explanation of Ohio’s stay-in-place order. Please look at only one state. Outline two arguments: How the stay-in-place order is constitutional. How the stay-in-place order is unconstitutional (in some aspect of it) and provide a good overview of the Constitution it violates (for example, the First Amendment). You have to make both arguments. You cannot argue that it is completely constitutional or completely unconstitutional. State your opinion on the issue and support your opinion with logical reasoning. The paper needs to be submitted as a Google doc. I really don’t want PDFs. The paper has to be MLA The paper needs to be double spaced, The paper needs to have the following as separate pages: Title page Even if you are following MLA, I want the paper to have a title page. I understand MLA doesn’t require a title page, but I do. Simply take the information that you would put in the upper-left hand corner of the first page and put that on your title page.) Please don’t use any fancy formatting or graphics for the title page. Use the same style and font as the rest of the paper. I prefer Times New Roman, 12-point font. References or works cited page. Every item cited in the essay needs to be listed on the references page or works cited page. And every item listed on your references or works cited page needs to be cited within the text of the essay. Font. As noted above, I prefer 12-point, Times New Roman font. Word count: 1,200 words in length. The word count does not include the following: Title page References or works cited page Margins should be 1-inch, all the way around. The minimum number of required references is 5. References that you will likely use and are (of course) free to use but do not count toward the 5 required references and should be listed on your references page if you use them: The United States Constitution Supreme Court cases or any court cases Any U.S. Statutes or U.S. Regulations In other words, the items listed above are certainly legitimate references. It’s simply the case they don’t get to count toward your 5.For me, good sources for essays in this class fall into three categories and are defined as the following: Category 1 (highest quality) Peer-reviewed journals; Books (but not any textbook); Category 2 (acceptable but lower quality): Traditional news magazines such as The Economist, Newsweek, or Time;, Traditional newspapers such as The New York Times or The Washington Post, Articles or data at Pew Research or Gallup. Category 3: Websites that are generally viewed as somewhat ideologically driven but not necessarily lower in quality than category 2): CNN, Fox News, MSNBC For me, the following are considered bad or unacceptable sources, and should not be used: About.com, Blogs, Dictionaries, Encyclopedias (except as approved by me; you have to send me an email and get my permission), Essays.com, Howstuffworks.com, Quora, Social media including but not limited to: Facebook, Instagram, Pinterest, Twitter, Textbooks (including the one for this class), Think tank reports (unless approved by me); think tanks include the following: Brookings Institution, Cato Institute, Heritage Foundation, Wikipedia, Yahoo! Answers
	Distinguished (100%)	Proficient (85%)		Basic (70%)	Below Expectations (50%)	Non-Performance (0%)
Thesis Statement	Raises the strongest   objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is strongly grounded in research and logical reasoning.	Raises a plausible objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is mostly grounded in research and logical reasoning.		Raises an objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is somewhat grounded in research and logical reasoning.	Attempts to raise an objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is minimally grounded in research and logical reasoning.	The objection to the thesis is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Counter Argument	Provides a strong, thorough rebuttal to the objection. The rebuttal effectively demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and applies the principles of charity and accuracy.	Provides a rebuttal to the objection. The rebuttal mostly demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and mostly applies the principles of charity and accuracy.		Provides a limited rebuttal to the objection. The rebuttal somewhat demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and somewhat applies the principles of charity and accuracy.	Attempts to provide a rebuttal to the objection; however, the rebuttal minimally demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and does not apply the principles of charity and accuracy.	The rebuttal is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Conclusion	Provides clear and concise closing remarks that comprehensively summarize the essay. The remarks consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problem.	Provides closing remarks that summarize the essay. The remarks mostly consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problem. The closing remarks are somewhat unclear.		Provides closing remarks that minimally summarizes the essay. The remarks minimally consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problems. The closing remarks are unclear and/or vague.	Attempts to provide closing remarks that summarize the essay; however, the remarks do not consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problem. The closing remarks are unclear and vague.	The closing remarks are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.
Written Communication: Context of and Purpose for Writing	Demonstrates methodical application of organization and presentation of content. The purpose of the writing is evident and easy to understand. Summaries, quotes, and/or paraphrases fit naturally into the sentences and paragraphs. Paper flows smoothly.	Demonstrates sufficient application of organization and presentation of content. The purpose of the writing is, for the most part, clear and easy to understand. There are some problems with the blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper flows somewhat smoothly.		Demonstrates a limited understanding of organization and presentation of content in written work. The purpose of the writing is somewhat evident but may not be integrated throughout the assignment. There are many problems with the blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper does not flow smoothly in all sections.	Organization and presentation of content are extremely limited. The purpose of the writing is unclear. There is little or no blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper does not flow smoothly when read.	The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics	– Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.	Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand		Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors which may slightly distract the reader.	Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors which distract the reader.	The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: Required Formatting	Accurately uses required formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.	Exhibits required formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors.		Exhibits limited knowledge of required formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all requirements.	Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of required formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as required style.	The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: Word Requirement	The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of words.	The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of words.		The length of the paper is equivalent to at least three quarters of the required number of words.	The length of the paper is equivalent to at least one half of the required number of words.	The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: Resource Requirement	Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.	Uses the required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.		Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.	Uses an inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly.	The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.