Critical Analysis Paper – Mutual benefits company ponzi scheme

 

 

Order Number			45471455714
Type of Paper			Essay
Writer Classification Level			Undergraduate
Style of Writing			MLA/APA/CHICAGO/
Sources and References			5
Number of Pages			4
Paper Instructions Description The words I have typed in red are what must be used. Business Ethics Grading Rubric/Evaluation Form: Business Ethics Critical Analysis Paper Name Maximum Points: 200 Category Criteria Possible Points Points Awarded Introductory Paragraph · Captivating attention getter ” Peter Lombardi put the lives of many terminally ill patients in danger, but he only thought of himself” · Brief overview of Peter & the Scheme Clear and concise thesis statement that covers all main points (three required) 20 “PETER LOMBARDI AND THE MUTUAL BENEFITS COMPANY’S PONZI SCHEME” Body Section #1 PONZI SCHEME · First main “thesis point” Ponzi Scheme · Two or more Shaw (2017) in-text citations included 30 Body Section #2 SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY · Second main “thesis point” Social Responsibility · Two or more Shaw (2017) in-text citations included 30 Body Section #3 JUSTICE · Third main “thesis point” Justice · Two or more Shaw (2017) in-text citations included 30 Critical Analysis Section · Integration of scholarly reference(s) to substantiate or refute your argument. At least “one” must be a “new” article, unused anywhere else in the paper, that someone wrote about the speech. 30 Summary (Conclusion) · Clear summation with direct ties to introductory paragraph 10 Grammar/Punctuation · Correct grammar usage (e.g., spelling, subject/verb agreement, and punctuation) 25 American Psychological Association (APA) Formatting · Cover page · Subsequent page formatting correct · Major headings (bold and centered) · Proper in-text citations for direct quotations and paraphrased elements · In-text citations align with those on reference page · Concise reference page formatting (all required references included; minimum of three) 25 Grand Total /200 Critical Analysis Paper: You will be tasked with writing a Critical Analysis essay (4 to 6 pages, excluding cover and reference pages). You will be required to use APA formatting and conduct research. For this particular assignment, you will be analyzing and evaluating a prominent, ethical or unethical entrepreneur in the business world. You will explore a specific case/event pertaining to that individual. Body Paragraph 1 – Shaw (2017) in-text citations (Ponzi Scheme) 1) “In a ponzi scheme, a con artist takes in money from investors but keeps it for himself rather than investing it as promised (Shaw, 2017)”. Page 44 2) “But what are the appropriate principles to rely on when making moral judgments? The truth is that there is no consensus among people who have studied ethics and reflected on these matters. Different theories exist as to the proper standard of right and wrong. As the British philosopher Bernard Williams put it, we are heirs to a rich and complex ethical tradition, in which a variety of different moral principles and ethical considerations intertwine and sometimes compete” (Shaw, 2017). Possibly paraphrase???? Page 45 Body Paragraph 2 – Shaw (2017) in-text citations (Social Responsibility) 1) “According to Friedman, to say that executives have social responsibility beyond the pursuit of profit means that they must sometimes subordinate owner interests to some social objective, such as controlling pollution or fighting inflation. They are then spending stockholder money for general social interests – in effect, taxing the owners and spending those taxes on social causes.” Page 165 2) “They see the modern corporation as a social institution that should consider the interests of all the groups it has an impact on. Sometimes called the social entity model or the stakeholder model, this broader view maintains that a corporation has obligations not only to its stakeholders but also to other constituencies that affect or are affected by its behavior-that is, to all parties that have a legitimate interest (a stake) in what the corporation does or doesn’t do.” Page 166 Body Paragraph 3 – Shaw (2017) in-text citations (Justice) 1) “Justice requires that people get what they deserve or, as a number of ancient moralists put it, that each receive his or her due.” Page 87 2) “Justice, then, is an important subclass of morality in general, a subclass that generally involves appeals to the overlapping notions of fairness, equality, desert, and rights.” Page 87
	Distinguished (100%)	Proficient (85%)		Basic (70%)	Below Expectations (50%)	Non-Performance (0%)
Thesis Statement	Raises the strongest   objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is strongly grounded in research and logical reasoning.	Raises a plausible objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is mostly grounded in research and logical reasoning.		Raises an objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is somewhat grounded in research and logical reasoning.	Attempts to raise an objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is minimally grounded in research and logical reasoning.	The objection to the thesis is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Counter Argument	Provides a strong, thorough rebuttal to the objection. The rebuttal effectively demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and applies the principles of charity and accuracy.	Provides a rebuttal to the objection. The rebuttal mostly demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and mostly applies the principles of charity and accuracy.		Provides a limited rebuttal to the objection. The rebuttal somewhat demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and somewhat applies the principles of charity and accuracy.	Attempts to provide a rebuttal to the objection; however, the rebuttal minimally demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and does not apply the principles of charity and accuracy.	The rebuttal is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Conclusion	Provides clear and concise closing remarks that comprehensively summarize the essay. The remarks consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problem.	Provides closing remarks that summarize the essay. The remarks mostly consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problem. The closing remarks are somewhat unclear.		Provides closing remarks that minimally summarizes the essay. The remarks minimally consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problems. The closing remarks are unclear and/or vague.	Attempts to provide closing remarks that summarize the essay; however, the remarks do not consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problem. The closing remarks are unclear and vague.	The closing remarks are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.
Written Communication: Context of and Purpose for Writing	Demonstrates methodical application of organization and presentation of content. The purpose of the writing is evident and easy to understand. Summaries, quotes, and/or paraphrases fit naturally into the sentences and paragraphs. Paper flows smoothly.	Demonstrates sufficient application of organization and presentation of content. The purpose of the writing is, for the most part, clear and easy to understand. There are some problems with the blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper flows somewhat smoothly.		Demonstrates a limited understanding of organization and presentation of content in written work. The purpose of the writing is somewhat evident but may not be integrated throughout the assignment. There are many problems with the blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper does not flow smoothly in all sections.	Organization and presentation of content are extremely limited. The purpose of the writing is unclear. There is little or no blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper does not flow smoothly when read.	The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics	– Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.	Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand		Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors which may slightly distract the reader.	Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors which distract the reader.	The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: Required Formatting	Accurately uses required formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.	Exhibits required formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors.		Exhibits limited knowledge of required formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all requirements.	Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of required formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as required style.	The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: Word Requirement	The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of words.	The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of words.		The length of the paper is equivalent to at least three quarters of the required number of words.	The length of the paper is equivalent to at least one half of the required number of words.	The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: Resource Requirement	Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.	Uses the required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.		Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.	Uses an inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly.	The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.