Evidence Based Practice change process

One systematic review from the CCN Library databases was identified and was clearly appropriate.

A systematic review was selected from the CCN Library databases and was mostly appropriate for a nursing change process.

A systematic review was selected from the CCN Library databases and was fairly appropriate for a nursing change process.

A systematic review was selected, but not from the CCN Library databases and/or was not appropriate for this assignment.

No systematic review selected or used.

Star Point 1 elements in the first column were thoroughly addressed.

Star Point 1 elements in the first column were mostly well addressed.

Star Point 1 was missing one element in the first column or one lacked detail.

Star Point 1 was missing more than one element in the first column and others lacked detail.

The ACE Star Model Star Point 1 was not completed.

Star Point 2 elements in the first column were thoroughly addressed.

Star Point 2 elements in the first column were mostly well addressed.

Star Point 2 was missing one element in the first column or one lacked detail.

Star Point 2 was missing more than one element in the first column and others lacked detail. or were inappropriate.

The ACE Star Model Star Point 2 was not completed.

Star Point 3 elements in the first column were thoroughly addressed.

Star Point 3 elements in the first column were mostly well addressed.

Star Point 3. was missing one element in the first column or one lacked detail.

Star Point 3 was missing more than one element in the first column and others lacked detail.

The ACE Star Model Star Point 3 was not completed.

Star Point 4 elements in the first column were thoroughly addressed.

Star Point 4 elements in the first column were mostly well addressed

Star Point 4 was missing one element in the first column or one lacked detail.

Star Point 4 was missing more than one element in the first column and others lacked detail.

The ACE Star Model Star Point 4 was not completed.

Star Point 5 elements in the first column were thoroughly addressed.

Star Point 5 elements in the first column were mostly well addressed

Star Point 5 was missing one element in the first column or one lacked detail.

Star Point 5 was missing more than one element in the first column and others lacked detail.

The ACE Star Model Star Point 5 was not completed.

Information was presented clearly and thoughts were well organized and logical throughout.

Information was presented clearly and thoughts were mainly organized and logical throughout.

Information was presented clearly and thoughts were somewhat organized and logical throughout.

Information was not consistently clear and/or was not consistently organized and logical.

Information was disorganized and difficult to understand.

Excellent mechanics and APA formatting with minimal errors in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure.

Good mechanics and formatting considering the elements listed in the first column

Fair mechanics and formatting considering the elements listed in the first column

Poor mechanics and formatting considering the elements listed in the first column

Very poor mechanics and formatting such that information is difficult to read.

0 points deducted

Correct assignment form used

22.5 points (10%) deducted

Incorrect form used resulting in point deduction

0 points deducted

Submitted on time

Not submitted on time – Point deduction

1 day late =11.25 deduction; 2 days=22.5 deduction; 3 days=33.75 deduction; 4 days =45 deduction; 5 days = 56.25 deduction; 6 days =67.5 deduction; 7 days =78.75 deduction; Score of 0 if more than 7 days late