LACC Flint Michigan Water Crises Presentation

 

 

Order Number			45471455714
Type of Paper			Essay
Writer Classification Level			Undergraduate
Style of Writing			MLA/APA/CHICAGO/
Sources and References			5
Number of Pages			4
Paper Instructions 1. Decide on the goal of your presentation. Make sure your goal is specific. Write your goal at the top of the outline. Are you informing the audience? Is there something they need to understand? Are you persuading the audience of taking an action? Signing up for something? Changing a behavior? Volunteering? Are you persuading the audience to hold a certain belief? 2. Plan the body of the presentation. You need an introduction, at least three main points (no more than 4), the subpoints, and a conclusion. I. Introduction (approximately 1 minute) A. Opener or Attention Getter (statistics, quotes, images, stories, ask a question) B. Significance of Topic (impact on public health globally or within a certain community) C. Relevance to Audience (why should they want to know, why should they care) D. Tell Them What You Are Going to Tell Them (a quick overview) II. Body – Tell Them (approximately 3 minutes) A. 1st Main Point (you can write main points as a word, a phrase, or a full sentence, your choice) 1. Subpoints (you do not need to have 3, you could have 4, but no less than 2) 2. 3. B. 2nd Main Point 1. Subpoints (you do not need to have 3, you could have 4, but no less than 2) 2. 3. C. 3rd Main Point 1. Subpoints (you do not need to have 3, you could have 4, but no less than 2) 2. 3. III. Conclusion (approximately 1 minute) A. Summary of Topic – Tell Them What You Told Them B. Call to Action – What Do You Want Your Audience to Do (only if it was a persuasive speech) C. Say “Thank you”. Slides do include at least 5 slides include any numerical information include images (for non-copyrighted images, search Creative Commons) (Links to an external site.) cite where images came from use correct spelling and grammar Slides do not have too many graphics that overwhelm – think “less is more” have too much text – people don’t want to read too much look cluttered have animations have sound use Helvetica or Arial font have at least 32 point font size for the title of each slide ***********CITING INFORMATION*** 1. Include at least three different sources. Your sources can be websites, books, journal articles, videos, etc. 2. Cite your sources following APA style. Below are examples. BASIC FORMAT FOR BOOKS Author, A. A. (Year of publication). Title of work: Capital letter also for subtitle. Publisher Name. ARTICLE IN ELECTRONIC JOURNAL Denny, H., Nordlof, J., & Salem, L. (2018). “Tell me exactly what it was that I was doing that was so bad”: Understanding the needs and expectations of working-class students in writing centers. Writing Center Journal, 37(1), 67–98. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26537363 (Links to an external site.) ARTICLE IN A MAGAZINE Peterzell, J. (1990, April). Better late than never. Time, 135(17), 20–21. ARTICLE IN A NEWSPAPER Schultz, S. (2005, December). Calls made to strengthen state energy policies. The Country Today, 1A, 2A. WEBPAGE OR PIECE OF ONLINE CONTENT If the page names an individual author, cite their name first: Last name, F. M. (Year, Month Date). Title of page. Site name. URL Price, D. (2018, March 23). Laziness does not exist. Medium. https://humanparts.medium.com/laziness-does-not-exist-3af27e312d01 (Links to an external site.) FILM OR VIDEO Director, D. D. (Director). (Date of publication). Title of motion picture [Film]. Production company. Loyd, P. (Director). (2008). Mamma mia! [Film]. Universal Pictures.
	Distinguished (100%)	Proficient (85%)		Basic (70%)	Below Expectations (50%)	Non-Performance (0%)
Thesis Statement	Raises the strongest   objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is strongly grounded in research and logical reasoning.	Raises a plausible objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is mostly grounded in research and logical reasoning.		Raises an objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is somewhat grounded in research and logical reasoning.	Attempts to raise an objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is minimally grounded in research and logical reasoning.	The objection to the thesis is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Counter Argument	Provides a strong, thorough rebuttal to the objection. The rebuttal effectively demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and applies the principles of charity and accuracy.	Provides a rebuttal to the objection. The rebuttal mostly demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and mostly applies the principles of charity and accuracy.		Provides a limited rebuttal to the objection. The rebuttal somewhat demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and somewhat applies the principles of charity and accuracy.	Attempts to provide a rebuttal to the objection; however, the rebuttal minimally demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and does not apply the principles of charity and accuracy.	The rebuttal is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Conclusion	Provides clear and concise closing remarks that comprehensively summarize the essay. The remarks consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problem.	Provides closing remarks that summarize the essay. The remarks mostly consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problem. The closing remarks are somewhat unclear.		Provides closing remarks that minimally summarizes the essay. The remarks minimally consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problems. The closing remarks are unclear and/or vague.	Attempts to provide closing remarks that summarize the essay; however, the remarks do not consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problem. The closing remarks are unclear and vague.	The closing remarks are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.
Written Communication: Context of and Purpose for Writing	Demonstrates methodical application of organization and presentation of content. The purpose of the writing is evident and easy to understand. Summaries, quotes, and/or paraphrases fit naturally into the sentences and paragraphs. Paper flows smoothly.	Demonstrates sufficient application of organization and presentation of content. The purpose of the writing is, for the most part, clear and easy to understand. There are some problems with the blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper flows somewhat smoothly.		Demonstrates a limited understanding of organization and presentation of content in written work. The purpose of the writing is somewhat evident but may not be integrated throughout the assignment. There are many problems with the blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper does not flow smoothly in all sections.	Organization and presentation of content are extremely limited. The purpose of the writing is unclear. There is little or no blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper does not flow smoothly when read.	The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics	– Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.	Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand		Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors which may slightly distract the reader.	Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors which distract the reader.	The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: Required Formatting	Accurately uses required formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.	Exhibits required formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors.		Exhibits limited knowledge of required formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all requirements.	Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of required formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as required style.	The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: Word Requirement	The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of words.	The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of words.		The length of the paper is equivalent to at least three quarters of the required number of words.	The length of the paper is equivalent to at least one half of the required number of words.	The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: Resource Requirement	Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.	Uses the required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.		Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.	Uses an inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly.	The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.