RESEARCH PROBLEM, PURPOSE, AND THEORETICAL/CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK

 

 

Order Number			45471455714
Type of Paper			Essay
Writer Classification Level			Undergraduate
Style of Writing			MLA/APA/CHICAGO/
Sources and References			5
Number of Pages			4
Paper Instructions Description Case Assignment The Case Assignments in this course are designed to assist you with the completion of the Doctoral Study Proposal. Each module will provide you with instructions and guidance on how to complete a component of the proposal. You are expected to follow the steps below: Review all module content including the information provided on the module homepage. Incorporate any changes into your subsequent Case Assignments based on instructor feedback. Use the track changes function in Word beginning with Case 2, so the instructor can follow the modifications you make to your document over time. Using the module content as a guide, draft the following sections: Background Write a brief introduction to the methodology as a whole. Indicate the type of methodology that will be employed (qualitative, quantitative, mixed method). Describe the goals of the research study. The introduction should be one paragraph. Here is an exercise to help you draft this section: Complete the Checklist: Questions to Ask Yourself When Deciding on a Topic in the SAGE Research Methods Project Planner. Are you interested enough in the topic? You need to be motivated to start your project, carry out the research, and see it through to the end. Do you know enough about the general context of the topic you want to work on? You need this to be able to develop a decent account of what you are looking for in your research. If you lack this knowledge, you’ll need time to develop it. Can you refine your topic down to a description of doable research? Do you know how you will actually do the research? You will need the appropriate data gathering skills and competencies—or the time to learn them before starting your research. Do you know what resources you need to do the research? You’ll also need to know how and where to get them. Do you know what kind of ethical approval you need? You’ll need to get this organized in time to start the research Can your project be done in the time available? Statement of the Problem Provide 1 or 2 paragraphs for the statement of the problem. It should address the following: What is the overriding problem? Where is the problem found? (context or setting) What needs to be done to solve the problem? Here is a reading to help you draft this section: Refer to p. 88 in the Ayiro (2012) text and draft a problem statement that includes the five components listed. The topic, the problem, justification of the importance of the problem, deficiencies in current knowledge, and the audience(s) who will benefit from the study. Purpose of the Study Provide 2 or 3 paragraphs for the purpose of the study. The purpose statement should begin with “The purpose of this (qualitative/quantitative/mixed methods) study is to …” Qualitative: the central phenomena under study is explained Quantitative: the variables are identified and defined Mixed methods: both the central phenomena and variables are described In addition, The participants in the study are mentioned The setting of the study is explained The purpose statement compliments the problem statement Conceptual or Theoretical Framework Provide 4 or 5 paragraphs for the conceptual or theoretical framework of your study. Your conceptual or theoretical framework is based on your review of the literature and is clearly linked to your purpose statement. How does your study address a gap in the literature/research? What constructs (or variables) does your study attempt to explore or examine? Situate your study within other theory and research. Summarize why your study and the selected methodology addresses the phenomena or variables under study. Here is a reading to help you draft this section and better understand the conceptual or theoretical framework: Grant, C., & Osanloo, A. (2014). Understanding, selecting, and integrating a theoretical framework in dissertation research: Creating the blueprint for your “house.” Administrative Issues Journal: Education, Practice & Research, 4(2), 12–26. Your conceptual or theoretical framework informs your research questions, methodology, and instrument. Assignment Expectations Assignment-driven criteria 30% (15 points) Demonstrates mastery covering all key elements of the assignment in a substantive way. Critical thinking/Application to Professional Practice 25% (12 points) Demonstrates mastery conceptualizing the problem, and careful consideration of experts or research in the field of educational leadership. Module content and concepts are thoroughly and thoughtfully analyzed, synthesized, and evaluated thoroughly. Conclusions are logically presented and applied to professional practice in an exceptional manner. Scholarly writing 15% (8 points) Demonstrates mastery and proficiency in scholarly written communication at the doctoral level. Quality of references and organization 10% (5 points) Demonstrates mastery using relevant and quality sources and uses appropriate, relevant, and compelling content from the module readings or other sources to support ideas, and convey understanding of the topic and shape the work. Citing sources 10% (5 points) Demonstrates mastery applying APA formatting standards to both in-text citations and the reference list. Professionalism and Timeliness 10% (5 points) Demonstrates excellence in taking responsibility for learning; adhering to course requirement policies and expectations. Assignments submitted on time or collaborated with professor for an approved extension on due date.
	Distinguished (100%)	Proficient (85%)		Basic (70%)	Below Expectations (50%)	Non-Performance (0%)
Thesis Statement	Raises the strongest   objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is strongly grounded in research and logical reasoning.	Raises a plausible objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is mostly grounded in research and logical reasoning.		Raises an objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is somewhat grounded in research and logical reasoning.	Attempts to raise an objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is minimally grounded in research and logical reasoning.	The objection to the thesis is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Counter Argument	Provides a strong, thorough rebuttal to the objection. The rebuttal effectively demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and applies the principles of charity and accuracy.	Provides a rebuttal to the objection. The rebuttal mostly demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and mostly applies the principles of charity and accuracy.		Provides a limited rebuttal to the objection. The rebuttal somewhat demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and somewhat applies the principles of charity and accuracy.	Attempts to provide a rebuttal to the objection; however, the rebuttal minimally demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and does not apply the principles of charity and accuracy.	The rebuttal is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Conclusion	Provides clear and concise closing remarks that comprehensively summarize the essay. The remarks consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problem.	Provides closing remarks that summarize the essay. The remarks mostly consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problem. The closing remarks are somewhat unclear.		Provides closing remarks that minimally summarizes the essay. The remarks minimally consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problems. The closing remarks are unclear and/or vague.	Attempts to provide closing remarks that summarize the essay; however, the remarks do not consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problem. The closing remarks are unclear and vague.	The closing remarks are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.
Written Communication: Context of and Purpose for Writing	Demonstrates methodical application of organization and presentation of content. The purpose of the writing is evident and easy to understand. Summaries, quotes, and/or paraphrases fit naturally into the sentences and paragraphs. Paper flows smoothly.	Demonstrates sufficient application of organization and presentation of content. The purpose of the writing is, for the most part, clear and easy to understand. There are some problems with the blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper flows somewhat smoothly.		Demonstrates a limited understanding of organization and presentation of content in written work. The purpose of the writing is somewhat evident but may not be integrated throughout the assignment. There are many problems with the blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper does not flow smoothly in all sections.	Organization and presentation of content are extremely limited. The purpose of the writing is unclear. There is little or no blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper does not flow smoothly when read.	The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics	– Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.	Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand		Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors which may slightly distract the reader.	Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors which distract the reader.	The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: Required Formatting	Accurately uses required formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.	Exhibits required formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors.		Exhibits limited knowledge of required formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all requirements.	Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of required formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as required style.	The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: Word Requirement	The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of words.	The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of words.		The length of the paper is equivalent to at least three quarters of the required number of words.	The length of the paper is equivalent to at least one half of the required number of words.	The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: Resource Requirement	Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.	Uses the required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.		Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.	Uses an inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly.	The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.